Joint Editors
Lynne Harrison
Lynne Harrison
Paul Fulbrook
Paul Fulbrook
Login in problems?
Some of our users are experiencing problems when registering/logging in to Connect to view the current issue. If you are experiencing such problems, please email the webmaster, and you will be provided with a temporary login solution while your issue is resolved. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience.

EDITORIAL:

Bed safety

Paul Fulbrook, Professor of Nursing, National Centre for Clinical Outcomes Research, Australian Catholic University, and Nursing Director Research & Practice Development, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Perhaps the most taken for granted piece of equipment that is used in modern health care is the hospital bed. However, in recent decades the 'humble' bed has morphed from being a basic piece of ironmongery to become a sophisticated therapeutic tool. Nowehere is this more apparent than in the critical care setting, where the bed is used not only for comfort and to position the patient effectively but often to deliver treatments such as cooling and warming, physiotherapy, and rotational therapy.
Although the hospital bed is a vital, it poses a risk to patients. In the critical care setting especially, patients are often sedated, confused and/or disorientated. Futhermore, their critical illness usually means that they are weak and, in addition, they often have muscle loss and joint stiffness. These problems may also be compounded by deteriorating sight and hearing, which are frequently found in the older population. These factors are particularly important to consider during the patient's recovery phase, when they are starting to become more mobile. At this time, they are more likely to be moved from the bed for short periods. For example, to sit in a chair as part of their rehabilitative process. As they gain strength they begin to move around in the bed more. This is a time of significant risk, when the potential for the patient to fall from the bed is greater. Vigilant nursing observation is required.
There is a growing body of evidence that highlights the risks associated with hospital beds: falls, entrapment, strangulation and even death. In this context, there are two critical factors: the height of the bed and the use of bed rails. It has been known for some time that 70-90% of falls, in the health care setting, occur as the patient tries to exit the bed for toileting purposes.
Historically, bed rails have been used as a safety measure to protect patients from falling from bed. Their use was perpetuated, in the USA especially, due to litigation payouts when patients sustained injuries from falls when bed rails were not used. However, current evidence indicates that that although patients in low, rail-less beds may fall more often, they have no greater injury rate compared to patients in high beds using half-rails or no rails. 50-90% of falls from bed in hospital occur despite bed rails being applied (Oliver, 2002). Bed rails do not prevent falls; they simply increase the height of the fall and therefore increase the extent of the injury.
The risk of strangulation and suffocation can be reduced if correct bed rails are used. International Standard 60601-2-38 governs hospital beds. It states that bed rails should not have a gap between the rungs greater than 120mm and there should be a 60mm maximum gap between the mattress and the bed rail (FDA, 2006).
In essence, the way to reduce the risk of falls and injury is simple: lower the bed and do not use bed rails. If the latter are used, then half rails are better, as they reduce the likelihood that a patient will attempt to climb over them.

REFERENCES
Food and Drug Administration (2006). Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment – Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. USA: FDA.
Oliver D (2002). Bed falls and bedrails – what should we do? Age and Ageing 31(5), 415-418.

Log-in is required to view articles.
Register FREE

Contents

2009 - Volume 7 Issue 1

CONNECT en Español: reto, sueño o necesidad? [CONNECT in Spanish: challenge, dream or necessity? ]

Colombia flag

Wilson Cañón, Laura María Alberto

Global Connections

Using monitoring technology in Cameroon

UK flag

Gibson D’Cruz, Kate Allen

Global Connections

Noise in the intensive care unit: a summary review

Italy flag

Gian Domenico Giusti, Federica Piergentili

Clinical Connections

The role of the nurse in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Hong Kong flag

Amy Kit Man Kwong, Sek Ying Chair, Lorna Kwai Ping Suen

Clinical Connections

Ethical dilemma: do not resuscitate a vegetative paediatric patient

Hong Kong flag

Wong Pik Yan Pat, Lorna Kwai Ping Suen, Sek Ying Chair

Clinical Connections

If you are logged in you will be able to click on the title and read the article.
Registration is free and simple so if you have not already, Register now.
N.B. The Article will open in a new window. Depending on the size of the article and speed of your connection this may take some time.

 

This editorial/index page is available as a pdf to download.

 CONFERENCE CONNECTIONS
  GLOBAL CONNECTIONS
  INTERNET CONNECTIONS
 CURRENT ISSUE
  PREVIOUS ISSUES
 AUTHORS GUIDELINES
  SUBMIT ARTICLE
None Currently Available
FRANCE
GERMANY
KOREA
SOUTH AFRICA
SPAIN
SWITZERLAND
UNITED KINGDOM
ON THE WEB
CONNECT LINKS
MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS